.
Feedback

Reed Subgroup Fails Federal Benchmark, Others Pass

The state Department of Education has issued its annual Adequate Yearly Progress reports, which shows a subgroup of Reed Intermediate School failing to meet performance standards.

Newtown and all of the public schools in town met adequate yearly progress standards with the exception of students with learning disabilities at Reed Intermediate School, according to data the Connecticut Department of Education released Monday.

Just slightly more than half of all schools in the state met performance standards set under the federal No Child Left Behind act, although due in part to a tightening of standards, the number of schools that failed the benchmark this year increased compared to last year, state officials said.

Newtown as a district and all of the town's public schools in general met those standards, which require that nine out of 10 students be proficient in math and reading based on Connecticut Mastery and Connecticut Academic Performance test results.

The only exception was with a subgroup at Reed Intermediate School – comprised of students with learning disabilities – which was among 14 statewide that failed reading proficiency standards, according to the state's data.

Subgroups of students are categorized based on race and ethnicity, English language learner status and special eduction. Mark Linabury, a spokesman for the state education department said on Tuesday that 73.5-percent of students with disabilities at Reed scored at proficiency levels on the reading section of the CMT. Federal benchmarks say that 89-percent should score at proficiency.

District and school officials could not be reached for comment Monday afternoon.

Last year, all subgroups and schools in the district met adequate yearly progress. In 2008-09 school year, a subgroup at Newtown Middle School failed proficiency standards in reading and math.

Adequate Yearly Progress is a standard that came into existence following the passage of the No Child Left Behind act in 2001, which sets an expectation for minimum performance standards in math and reading. By 2014, all students are expected to be proficient in the reading and math sections of the CMT and CAPT exams.

Every year, state officials have been increasing the standards in order to meet the 2014 goal. This year, adequate yearly progress is defined to be 89-percent of students testing proficient in the reading section of the CMT and 91-percent in the math section. The standards for CAPT are 91-percent in reading and 90-percent in math.

Newtown scores on the while that of the year before, though enough for the district to meet federal standards.

Editor's note: This article has been updated since it was originally published to identify the subgroup that failed federal benchmarks.

Sandy Anderson September 19, 2011 at 09:41 pm
VERY DISAPPOINTING..
Concerned Parent September 19, 2011 at 10:12 pm
Not surprised! Parents have been advocating for help at Reed all last year. Dr. Robinson is so focused on the HS, she is letting the foundation of our schools fall apart. The BOE refused to listen to parents last year regarding Reed, these results are more proof there are serious problems at that school!
Eric Paradis September 19, 2011 at 11:54 pm
I am not that surprised either. Mostly since I am not a fan of Accelerated Reader. It's a software based comprehension tester that really only tests low level understanding of the written word. In order to access the upper tiers of Bloom's Taxonomy, which is where critical thought comes into play, you need teachers, not computers.
Sam Mihailoff September 20, 2011 at 12:19 am
obviously more consultants and educational research needed..."yeah, that's the ticket"
Desiree Galassi September 20, 2011 at 01:06 am
Accelerated Reader serves it's purpose and computers have helped address the rising numbers in the classroom. However, it masks the real problem. More classroom teachers are needed and the ratio of teacher to student must drop so we can adequately meet the needs of all learners. I hope all concerned parents will advocate for smaller classrooms and saving key instructional positions at budget time. A district's most valuable and powerful tool is the teacher.
Sam Mihailoff September 20, 2011 at 01:14 am
If the head honcho did not squander money on consultants and lawyers there would be the funds for teachers...merely throwing more tax dollars to the school system and not addressing the mismanagement and incompetence is not going to bode well on referendum day whatsoever
Jacqueline Jensen September 20, 2011 at 04:48 am
I would be interested to know the size of the subgroup. I suggest paying attention to WHAT your child reads in the AR program to make certain it is at a somewhat challenging level for your child.
Karen C. Pierce September 20, 2011 at 12:19 pm
agree with you Eric. Other software that includes narrative responses is at best 65% accurate...according to their own standards.
Karen C. Pierce September 20, 2011 at 12:23 pm
The failure is regarding a subgroup, no all of Reed. That said my thought would be to check the state web site for CMT...they break it down by sub group.
One sub group has been brought before the state and BOE for further investigation...so this might be related to that.
Hoa Nguyen September 20, 2011 at 01:02 pm
Hi all, I finally got a call back from the state Department of Education, and the spokesman said that the subgroup that failed federal benchmarks was with students with disabilities at Reed. Federal requirements say that 89-percent of students should read at proficiency. At Reed, only 73.5-percent of students with disabilities at Reed read at proficiency. I've updated the article to reflect this.
Eric Paradis September 20, 2011 at 01:07 pm
The website to see the subgroup testing is CTreports.com. RIS does not have many subgroups, so I went to look at the students with disabilities group. For the reading test, 17/26 took the test and the results are not listed since there are less than 20 taking the test. It is possible that many took the modified CMT pilot and therefore did not have scores reported.
Karen C. Pierce September 20, 2011 at 01:09 pm
http://ctayp.emetric.net/ReportCards/2011/100971005_2011.PDF
T Stubbs September 20, 2011 at 04:49 pm
It is one subgroup of children with learning disabilities. Without knowledge of the makeup of the group (i.e. the number, severity, etc. of the children's disabilities) and the makeup of other districts' comparable subgroups, it may not be an apples to apples comparison. Districts may differ on their practices and procedures regarding "Learning Disability" designation.
I may be wrong about this, but it appears that of 70 children in the subgroup, about 19 fell below the reading benchmark when the Federal standard would have been met if only 8 missed the mark. For any of the 19 or so, they may have missed proficiency by one point. This may well be an area that deserves attention (i.e. more support staff for children with learning disabilities in elementary school and intermediate school), but I think it would be wise to keep the issue in perspective.
KCNewtowner September 20, 2011 at 04:51 pm
I do not like Accelerated Reader. Some kids don’t like to read due to difficulties, so this just reinforces that bad feeling. It makes them hate reading more. AR should include all printed material (newspapers and magazines) to keep the kids reading and interested. I don’t think taking a test is necessary. Maybe a short summary would be fine.
Larry K. September 20, 2011 at 05:45 pm
Be careful how you read this information. Ignorance is bliss, knowledge is power, and there is another side to this story. Because all of our 5th and 6th grade students go to Reed, there ends up being different accounting systems. A sub-group is not a sug-group unless there are a specific number of students in that sub-group(I think the state number is 40?). In our smaller K-4 schools, our special education numbers do not meet the "tippping point" of being labelled a sub-group. When you bring them all together in one school, there are enough to be classified as a sub-group by state standards. We could have equal or even better numbers on our state tests than we did when this cohort of students were spread out over four schools in fourth grade, but when they all come together in one school, the state requires us to report them as a sub-group. You have to look closer at the details to see how this group of students performs before you begin to rail against and rally for programs. Something to think about...
T Stubbs September 20, 2011 at 06:13 pm
RE: Accelerated Reader. As someone who taught literacy for 9 years, I found it extremely difficult to hold students accountable for reading while supporting the importance of student choice. Few teachers (especially new teachers) can read all the books that are written for young adults, so the challenge is to adequately check for some degree of comprehension in student chosen books before moving into higher realms of learning - application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Unless there is basic accountability for all, students are more likely to become reluctant readers. AR is one tool -- a tool I would have used if available - that holds students accountable for reading books they like. It is welcomed by parents whose children do not like to read or whose children would be more inclined to "fake it." Most teachers understand that not all assessments have to accomplish all learning objectives in all domains of learning. And, I agree, low student-teacher ratio, along with having skilled, hard-working educators, is the stuff of great schools.
Sam Mihailoff September 20, 2011 at 06:17 pm
what actually is the student-teacher ratio as well as the number of usable EA's
Desiree Galassi September 20, 2011 at 11:34 pm
I believe that information is updated in October when firm numbers are in ( there is always fluctuation from the time the budget documents are written to actual numbers).
If you go to the district's page ( www.newtown.k12.ct.us) and click on BOE then scroll down below all the pictures you will find the budget documents. Reed info is on page 33 etc...

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:47 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.
DOR June 19, 2013 at 08:56 am
I'm o n Butterfield. No sightings here. Any specifics as to her location?
Carol Chapman June 19, 2013 at 09:23 am
Norma has been spotted this morning at the intersection of Kenan and Currituck. The red leash isRead More still attached. She was trying to eat a dead squirrel on Currituck. Very skittish, but still in the neighborhood (yay). Please watch for her. My husband and sister-in-law (who first spotted her on Currituck this morning) were unable to get near her. She's in the woods, heading toward Butterfield. Her foster mom is on the scene now. Folks in the neighborhood, please watch for her and call 203-942-4008 if you see her.
Carol Chapman June 19, 2013 at 11:20 am
Carolee Mason (Newtown's Animal Control Officer) is watching her from her car at the moment, armedRead More with catfood to tempt her closer. The foster mom is on her way there again, this time with chicken, and Laura is on her way with hamburger. Problem is, this dog is VERY shy, skittish and quick to run away.
Betsy Kraushaar June 17, 2013 at 07:54 am
If you have goodies left that you are interested in donating to our Girl Scout Troop...pleaseRead More contact me. Our troop has been saving/ fundraising for a senior trip to Europe for the past 5 years. Thanks in advance, Betsy
Llyod Christmas June 17, 2013 at 09:01 pm
Hi Betsy! We have tons of children's books left, and would be more than happy to donate them. HowRead More should I get in touch with you to drop them off?
Betsy Kraushaar June 17, 2013 at 10:46 pm
Lloyd, My email is betsykraushaar@charter.net....I'd love to get some books...Thanks!!!
Every Friday, Rain or Shine, Lone Activist Stands
Elissa Bass June 14, 2013 at 08:44 pm
I do too.
Amy Pare June 16, 2013 at 09:28 am
This is amazing. Where is she standing?