.
Feedback

Newtown Board of Education: No Interim Superintendent Yet

After meeting for hours, the board say they're not prepared to announce the school's next temporary superintendent.


After at least two hours in a closed meeting Tuesday night, Newtown Board of Education chair Debbie Leidlein said the board was not ready to announce the interim superintendent position for Newtown's public schools.

"We're just not prepared to make an appointment tonight," Leidlein told reporters and one parent after meeting with other board members at the Newtown Municipal Center.

A scheduled public meeting to discuss and possibly act on the appointment was cancelled. Leidlein said the meeting had been necessary "in case the board came to a consensus."

In February, Superintendent Janet Robinson announced she would be leaving Newtown to take the helm as Stratford's Superintendent of Schools in July. Robinson has won accolades from educational organizations in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, but had already been vetted for the Stratford position prior to Dec. 14.

The board met with specialist Robert Rader last week, who recommended they pursue an interim superintendent as soon as possible to aid in a smooth transition.

"An interim superintendent comes in to help out when there's a hard situation and you don't want the next superintendent to have to deal with it," said Rader. "It enables your superintendent to come in with a clean slate."

Leidlein told reporters a meeting to continue the decision could possibly be scheduled for the upcoming week.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lois Imbriano Barber May 18, 2013 at 08:24 pm
To further support my support of Aurelia, the letter above states it was the New York Post thatRead More wanted the details. Good for you town clerk! I goggled the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information and they are indeed nothing more than a non-profit group. They are not a government agency. And an inept one - their own website is a mess. What clowns.- http://ctcouncilfoi.org/
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Town Clerk Aurelia is already causing the town to needlessly spend money defending her derelictionRead More of duty: "An attorney representing the town, with the law firm Cohen and Wolf, issued an opinion in response to the, (New York), Post's request stating that the public is only allowed to view death and marriage certificates that are "at least one hundred years old." Cost aside she is pushing for a state law that would restrict access to a minors birth certificate for 6 months, she originally wanted them sealed for 10 years. The only thing the proposed law is going to accomplish is the healing that has been accomplished is going to be undone when the seal expires. This is much ado about nothing. http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Newtown-officials-withhold-death-certificates-4526713.php
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:07 pm
While I have no desire to view any of these death certificates, the law is the law. I have neverRead More viewed a death certificate, I doubt there is anything listed beyond the name of the decedent, dates of birth & death, parentage, and cause of death. Town Clerk Aurelia is clearly in violation of her oath of office. Her job is not to be administered based on feelings. In doing this she is opening the town up to F.O.I. violations, potential litigation, and fanning the flames of the crazy conspiracy theories. To quote the article, "we feel its an extreme invasion of privacy for these families." Should someone take this to F.O.I. or put it before a judge the town will lose. Do your job as required by statute.