.
Feedback

BOE Meeting Provides Few Answers to Budget Cut

Newtown officials have instead scheduled a public information meeting on Monday to address questions.

Most questions about the $1 million reduction in the proposed school budget must wait for a special informational meeting Newtown town leaders have scheduled for Monday, but those at the Board of Education meeting Tuesday learned part of the answer to the question that might have defeated the budget in last week’s referendum.

That question: Why is the school budget increasing when school enrollment is going down?

School Supt. Dr. Janet Robinson said enrollment has gone down, but the decrease is distributed unevenly across all grades and schools, so it doesn’t easily allow her to cut teaching positions.

"Even though we show a decline of 150 students, they are at different places in the district," Robinson said.

She said declining enrollment must hit a "critical mass" before it can be translated into staff reductions without hurting the students’ education.

Robinson made her remarks during her report to the board, a regular agenda item. "Discussion and possible action regarding the 2012-13 budget" was also on the agenda, but Chairman Debbie Leidlein skipped it while announcing the meeting on Monday.

The informational meeting is set for 6:30 p.m. in , immediately prior to the Board of Selectmen meeting, limited to one hour. Members of the public will have a chance to ask questions about the school budget to the selectmen and members of the Board of Finance, Board of Education and Legislative Council.

Leidlein said the meeting was the idea of First Selectman Patricia Lladro.

She said it is intended to inform the public about the budget and get the vote out for the next referendum vote on May 15.

On April 25, following the defeat a day before of its first proposed budget, , reducing it to $68,355,794.

That is still an increase of about $384,000 from the present year, but it might jeopardize the district's plans to start all-day kindergarten.

It would also reduce the proposed tax increase from .57 mills to .31 mills (2.34 percent to 1.28 percent).

Council members who supported the reduction said their constituents had focused their complaints on the school budget. They said many had asked why the schools need more money when they have fewer students.

Robinson addressed another complaint that came out of the April 25 Council meeting, when Councilman Mitch Bolinsky blasted her for not attending the meeting.

The school superintendent said she was attending a meeting out of town that night and she was surprised no school board member defended her at the Council meeting.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Announcements  

0   Recommend Kurt Kling

Lois Imbriano Barber May 19, 2013 at 05:40 pm
I remember years ago that not all of the information about the Kennedy death and assassination wouldRead More not be unsealed until 2017, so why not be able to seal the records of these deaths for the same amount of time?
Lois Imbriano Barber May 18, 2013 at 08:24 pm
To further support my support of Aurelia, the letter above states it was the New York Post thatRead More wanted the details. Good for you town clerk! I goggled the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information and they are indeed nothing more than a non-profit group. They are not a government agency. And an inept one - their own website is a mess. What clowns.- http://ctcouncilfoi.org/
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Town Clerk Aurelia is already causing the town to needlessly spend money defending her derelictionRead More of duty: "An attorney representing the town, with the law firm Cohen and Wolf, issued an opinion in response to the, (New York), Post's request stating that the public is only allowed to view death and marriage certificates that are "at least one hundred years old." Cost aside she is pushing for a state law that would restrict access to a minors birth certificate for 6 months, she originally wanted them sealed for 10 years. The only thing the proposed law is going to accomplish is the healing that has been accomplished is going to be undone when the seal expires. This is much ado about nothing. http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Newtown-officials-withhold-death-certificates-4526713.php