.
Feedback

Sen. Blumenthal: Regulate 'Misleading' Colleges

The senator outlines his bill aimed at the for-profit college industry in this press release.

U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal called for a crackdown on the use of deceptive and misleading pitches in higher education that lure college students into taking on thousands of dollars in student loan debt for little academic and professional advancement in return.   

After receiving complaints from college students, Blumenthal introduced a bill that would prevent these abuses by requiring colleges to disclose information such as cost of attendance, student outcomes, academic offerings, and procedures for withdrawing and filing complaints. The bill is called the ACCEPT Act – the Advancing College Choice and Ethics to Protect Taxpayers Act (S.3550).   

“Deceptive and dishonest practices by colleges must be stopped,” Blumenthal said. "This bill sends a strong message that colleges cannot continue to conceal poor graduation rates, true tuition and other costs, and deficient academic offerings – putting enrollment and profit over education.
Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Labor, and Pensions, joined Blumenthal in introducing the bill as an original co-sponsor.

In July, Harkin released a report on the for-profit college industry – the result of a two-year long investigation of 30 for-profit colleges and corporations. Although none of the for-profit colleges and corporations investigated by Harkin are headquartered in Connecticut, three of corporations operate colleges in Connecticut: Apollo Group, which operates University of Phoenix in Norwalk, Career Education Corporation, which operates Sanford-Brown College, and Lincoln Educational Services Company, which operates Lincoln Tech.

The Aim of the Bill

•Ban deceptive practices, and strengthen the federal ban on misrepresentation by colleges by expanding the ban’s reach, increasing the penalty for violations, and targeting high-risk institutions and repeat offenders.

•Require colleges with a high percentage of student borrowers and a high student default rate to provide students with a waiting period between acceptance and enrollment. The bill would also prohibit these colleges from using financial aid to coerce students to enroll during this period, and ensure that prospective students at these colleges have the time to become fully informed of their financial aid eligibility at least one week prior to enrollment.

•Require colleges to make front-end disclosures to all prospective students regarding cost of attendance, student outcomes, academic offerings, and procedures for withdrawing and filing complaints.

•Provide all students with disclosure sheets on the colleges they are considering. These disclosure sheets would include key data on costs and outcomes with comparative context from states and the nation.

A Constituent Reaches Out

In January, Blumenthal received a letter from Madison, Conn. resident Seth Grenier. In 2008, Grenier enrolled in a software game development program at Westwood College, a for-profit college based in Denver, Colo.

According to Seth, his online courses involved outdated technology that was not fit for the needs of employers in the field. He also felt his courses were rushed and his instructors were not helpful.

Eventually, he became frustrated with the program and – after looking into Westwood College’s reputation and finding similar complaints from other students – withdrew in 2010. Although Seth withdrew from the program before the upcoming semester, he was still charged fees for it. Now, he and his parents are saddled with $30,000 in student loan debt.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lois Imbriano Barber May 19, 2013 at 05:40 pm
I remember years ago that not all of the information about the Kennedy death and assassination wouldRead More not be unsealed until 2017, so why not be able to seal the records of these deaths for the same amount of time?
Lois Imbriano Barber May 18, 2013 at 08:24 pm
To further support my support of Aurelia, the letter above states it was the New York Post thatRead More wanted the details. Good for you town clerk! I goggled the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information and they are indeed nothing more than a non-profit group. They are not a government agency. And an inept one - their own website is a mess. What clowns.- http://ctcouncilfoi.org/
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Town Clerk Aurelia is already causing the town to needlessly spend money defending her derelictionRead More of duty: "An attorney representing the town, with the law firm Cohen and Wolf, issued an opinion in response to the, (New York), Post's request stating that the public is only allowed to view death and marriage certificates that are "at least one hundred years old." Cost aside she is pushing for a state law that would restrict access to a minors birth certificate for 6 months, she originally wanted them sealed for 10 years. The only thing the proposed law is going to accomplish is the healing that has been accomplished is going to be undone when the seal expires. This is much ado about nothing. http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Newtown-officials-withhold-death-certificates-4526713.php