.
Feedback

More Voices, More Answers at Second Community Discussion

With the fate of Sandy Hook Elementary School still on the table and residents still vocal on solutions, Llodra reaffirms a commitment to avoid redistricting and says government will play a role in the decision.

NEWTOWN, CT -- Sandy Hook resident Todd Keeping is an officer in the Monroe Police Department. When Chalk Hill School welcomed displaced Sandy Hook students, he volunteered to help. What else could he do?

"I had to do that," he said, leaning down into the microphone to address fellow Newtown residents at the second community forum to discuss the fate of the school building Friday night at Newtown High School. "That is Sandy Hook School over there. Every day, when I drive in, the sign says Sandy Hook School. When they answer the phone, they say, 'Sandy Hook School.' You people and your children make it Sandy Hook School ... And I am so honored to be there."

On December 16 -- just two days after the shooting -- he returned to the site of what was once, he says, Sandy Hook Elementary School. He stood in front of the building where 20 children and six adults lost their lives, and realized he could never ask anyone to go back.

"That building ... It's not a school anymore," he said.

"I know your kids want to go back," he told parents in the audience. "But they want to go back to Sandy Hook School. They don't want to go back to that building ... You want to keep these teachers? Then you cannot ask any one of them to ever, ever go back there."

"We've Never Been Down This Road Before"

In both Friday night's community forum and the first session on Sunday, opinions have been divided: should parents and students ever return to the elementary school on Riverside Road?

In Sunday's session, some residents said students should be allowed back. Tonight, the opposing view seemed more prevalent among the 19 speakers onstage at the High School. In the last half-hour of the session, Llodra took questions directly from residents. Some wanted to know if the school's fate would be put to the community, as one resident put it, "as some sort of poll -- is it going to stay or go?" Another questioner suggested a weighted vote that would give more priority toward Sandy Hook staff and parents.

"I think we're going to hear everyone's perspective, put it all together and let the government process work," said Llodra. "That's the role of the government people to decide, okay, how do we make this final decision? It might be that a consensus emerges ... We've never been down this road before."

But she told residents she suspected there might not be a perfect solution.

"It's not that I'm leaning against [a poll], but it's not appropriate for me to decide how the government is going to answer the question," Llodra told Patch. "So I think when the elected representatives get together, that's how they want to make the decision -- that's what they want to discuss."

Llodra said representatives will go over records of these community conversations and private conversations with Sandy Hook Elementary family and staff.

"They'll get together and say, 'Okay, what do we know, what are the options, and then how are we going to make the decision?'"

Limitations and Reassurances

In this second forum, many residents' questions evolved as Llodra and elected officials allowed new information. Parents who had planned speeches against redistricting -- the only major consensus reached at Sunday's meeting -- scrapped them as both Llodra and Board of Education chair Debbie Leidlein reaffirmed their commitment to "keep the Sandy Hook families together."

However, Llodra told residents, the only suitable property available for a school in the Sandy Hook neighborhood is the elementary school ground itself. And while school population is declining, it hasn't done so enough to relocate students into  Reed Intermediate School, another idea. (She did tell residents that Fairfield Hills would be "another possibility.") Though some parents say their children don't like it, Llodra said Chalk Hill is currently the only space in the area big enough to house all Sandy Hook students.

Meanwhile, federal and state lawmakers are telling residents to count on their leverage. U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty, joining the forum, told residents she'd spoken with Vice President Joe Biden, who had pledged his support.

"I don't know how we're gonna do it, but we'll do it," said Esty. "You decide what you need. Our job is ... to make it happen as quickly as possible."

Many parents agreed the town should take advantage of state and federal promises.

"The state is offering all their support," said Sandy Hook resident Elizabeth East. "Let's aim for the moon."

East's daughter Isabel will be starting school this fall, and she hopes to see a resolution by then. She acknowledged it may be a "slightly unreasonable request."

"The kids need the school home in Sandy Hook, and we need to have a plan finalized very soon," said East. "Our kids have questions ... We parents need answers."

While Mary Ann Jacob -- a legislative council member and Sandy Hook staff member who was in the school on December 14 -- chose not to offer an opinion on the fate of the school, she brought encouragement in her speech.

"I don't know where we'll end up," she said. "When I think about what we should do, I can't help but think, what would Dawn do? ... We need to remember who we are as a community when we make this choice. And stay together. Remember, it's not about us. It's about our kids."

Patch will bring more coverage of this discussion, including full comments from many community members at this meeting, in the coming days. For more coverage of the Sandy Hook School question:

  • Read a selection of additional comments and opinions from Sunday's hearing

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Town Clerk Aurelia is already causing the town to needlessly spend money defending her derelictionRead More of duty: "An attorney representing the town, with the law firm Cohen and Wolf, issued an opinion in response to the, (New York), Post's request stating that the public is only allowed to view death and marriage certificates that are "at least one hundred years old." Cost aside she is pushing for a state law that would restrict access to a minors birth certificate for 6 months, she originally wanted them sealed for 10 years. The only thing the proposed law is going to accomplish is the healing that has been accomplished is going to be undone when the seal expires. This is much ado about nothing. http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Newtown-officials-withhold-death-certificates-4526713.php
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:07 pm
While I have no desire to view any of these death certificates, the law is the law. I have neverRead More viewed a death certificate, I doubt there is anything listed beyond the name of the decedent, dates of birth & death, parentage, and cause of death. Town Clerk Aurelia is clearly in violation of her oath of office. Her job is not to be administered based on feelings. In doing this she is opening the town up to F.O.I. violations, potential litigation, and fanning the flames of the crazy conspiracy theories. To quote the article, "we feel its an extreme invasion of privacy for these families." Should someone take this to F.O.I. or put it before a judge the town will lose. Do your job as required by statute.
Common Sense May 18, 2013 at 08:19 am
Exactly why do you need to read these reports Elmer Davis? The cause of death was gunshot wounds.Read More Why do you need more than that, and why do you feel your curiosity for details outweigh the need for privacy? I agree with Aurelia and support her. You're acting like the Connecticut Council on Freedom is a government agency. It is a non-profit foundation and the quote from James Smith is only an opinion. It certainly does NOT carry any more weight than anyone else's, including mine, the victim's families, and the vast majority of decent people living in this town.