.
Feedback

Report: Utilities Need to Get Aggressive on Tree Trimming

FERC report finds that more aggressive tree trimming would have gone a long way toward mitigating the widespread power outages that occurred in Connecticut in last October’s freak snow storm.

A joint report from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation finds that additional tree trimming would have gone a long way toward mitigating the widespread power outages that occurred in Connecticut .

According to the report (see attached PDF), 74 transmission lines and 44 transmission substations in the Northeast experienced outages in the bizarre storm which on the region . The bulk of the damage, however, was to local distribution lines when trees and branches fell on wires.

Altogether in storm — .

"Nearly three quarters of the transmission line outages occurred when healthy trees, most located outside of utility rights-of-way, fell onto the lines uprooted by the weight of the snow compounded by the soft, wet ground," a NERC press release announcing the report's findings states.

In addition to carrying out more aggressive tree trimming, the report recommends that the state's utilities revise their tree trimming policies and create more detailed reporting of "vegetation-caused outages."

The report suggests that utilities take into account growth rates of trees when installing new transmission lines — and identifying species of trees that either grow quickly and/or are more likely to fall.

Perhaps more important, the report recommends that utilities with , state regulators, and local town governments to located outside of rights of way.

In response to the report, The Connecticut Congressional Delegation issued the following statement:

“We were deeply troubled and frustrated by two major power disruptions in as many months, which wreaked havoc on the lives of our constituents, and called on FERC to investigate the reliability of Connecticut’s electric system," said state Senate and House leaders who issued the statement. "This important investigation by FERC and NERC has resulted in recommendations that must be taken seriously to ensure Connecticut residents and businesses will not find themselves in a similar situation again."

"Some of the report confirms what we already knew — such as downed trees were the leading cause of outages — but also makes clear utility companies need to be more vigilant to ensure a debacle like last fall is not repeated," the elected leaders said. "We urge CL&P and Northeast Utilities to work with the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection to ensure trees and other vegetation are better maintained to reduce the severity of future power outages.”

CL&P, the state's largest provider of electric power, has already responded to the need for additional tree trimming. According to a March report in , CL&P recently launched an expanded tree work program that includes significantly more routine and enhanced tree trimming across the state.

This year, CL&P plans to spend $53.5 million on tree trimming – an increase of approximately $27 million over 2011, the report states. The expanded tree work is being performed along 4,900 miles of the company’s utility poles and wires, an increase of 1,600 miles.

On May 25, Newtown First Selectman Patricia Llodra, along with Redding First Selectman Natalie Ketcham and Ridgefield First Selectman Rudy Marconi to the State of Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority in New Britain regarding the utilities' response to the October storm, as well as Tropical Strom Irene, which hit the state in late August.

Meanwhile the state's new awaits Gov. Dannel P. Malloy's signature.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lois Imbriano Barber May 18, 2013 at 08:24 pm
To further support my support of Aurelia, the letter above states it was the New York Post thatRead More wanted the details. Good for you town clerk! I goggled the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information and they are indeed nothing more than a non-profit group. They are not a government agency. And an inept one - their own website is a mess. What clowns.- http://ctcouncilfoi.org/
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Town Clerk Aurelia is already causing the town to needlessly spend money defending her derelictionRead More of duty: "An attorney representing the town, with the law firm Cohen and Wolf, issued an opinion in response to the, (New York), Post's request stating that the public is only allowed to view death and marriage certificates that are "at least one hundred years old." Cost aside she is pushing for a state law that would restrict access to a minors birth certificate for 6 months, she originally wanted them sealed for 10 years. The only thing the proposed law is going to accomplish is the healing that has been accomplished is going to be undone when the seal expires. This is much ado about nothing. http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Newtown-officials-withhold-death-certificates-4526713.php
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:07 pm
While I have no desire to view any of these death certificates, the law is the law. I have neverRead More viewed a death certificate, I doubt there is anything listed beyond the name of the decedent, dates of birth & death, parentage, and cause of death. Town Clerk Aurelia is clearly in violation of her oath of office. Her job is not to be administered based on feelings. In doing this she is opening the town up to F.O.I. violations, potential litigation, and fanning the flames of the crazy conspiracy theories. To quote the article, "we feel its an extreme invasion of privacy for these families." Should someone take this to F.O.I. or put it before a judge the town will lose. Do your job as required by statute.