.
Feedback

Legislature Approves Education Reform Bill

The reform bill now goes to Gov. Dannel P. Malloy for his signature.

 

The Connecticut House of Representatives unanimously approved the Tuesday night, after the state Senate approved the lengthy bill early Tuesday morning. The legislation is viewed as a compromise of sorts and ends months of controversy between Gov. Dannel P. Malloy and the Connecticut Education Association, the state's largest teachers union. 

Malloy has pledged to sign the bill into law. 

"I can say, with confidence, that this bill will allow us to begin fixing what is broken in our public schools," Malloy said during a hastily assembled press conference late Monday evening at the state Capitol to announce the agreement. 

The state Senate then huddled in chambers for the better part of the night Monday into Tuesday debating the bill, which is over 180 pages long, before finally 28-7 to approve it early Tuesday morning, according to the Connecticut Mirror. The state house then voted unanimously to approve the bill Tuesday evening. 

“This is historic legislation that sets a new direction for Connecticut,” State Rep. Geoff Luxenberg, D-Manchester, said in a statement shortly after the bill's passage. “There is a new renewed focus on education and a return to the basics – focusing on research based reading instruction, K-3 and significant investments in early childhood education.” 

The bill will: 

  • Create 1,000 new seats in preschool programs designated for "high need, low performing communities." 
  • Provide "intensive supports and interventions" for 25 designated "chronically low-performing" schools throughout the state, including plans to establish turnaround committees and pilot programs within those districts to advance the reforms. 
  • Expand funding and access to charter schools in the lowest performing districts, and additional funding for magnet schools, technical high schools and agricultural science schools. 
  • Implement changes to the teacher tenure and evaluation programs that ties tenure to "effectiveness" and evaluations and provides for the dismissal of "ineffective" teachers. 
  • Adds $50 million to the Education Cost Sharing grant to Connecticut public schools, with $39.5 million designated to the 30 lowest performing districts. 
  • Increases funding to state charter schools from $9,400 to $10,500 per pupil, with an increase of $500 in each of the next two fiscal years.

 

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lois Imbriano Barber May 18, 2013 at 08:24 pm
To further support my support of Aurelia, the letter above states it was the New York Post thatRead More wanted the details. Good for you town clerk! I goggled the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information and they are indeed nothing more than a non-profit group. They are not a government agency. And an inept one - their own website is a mess. What clowns.- http://ctcouncilfoi.org/
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Town Clerk Aurelia is already causing the town to needlessly spend money defending her derelictionRead More of duty: "An attorney representing the town, with the law firm Cohen and Wolf, issued an opinion in response to the, (New York), Post's request stating that the public is only allowed to view death and marriage certificates that are "at least one hundred years old." Cost aside she is pushing for a state law that would restrict access to a minors birth certificate for 6 months, she originally wanted them sealed for 10 years. The only thing the proposed law is going to accomplish is the healing that has been accomplished is going to be undone when the seal expires. This is much ado about nothing. http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Newtown-officials-withhold-death-certificates-4526713.php
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:07 pm
While I have no desire to view any of these death certificates, the law is the law. I have neverRead More viewed a death certificate, I doubt there is anything listed beyond the name of the decedent, dates of birth & death, parentage, and cause of death. Town Clerk Aurelia is clearly in violation of her oath of office. Her job is not to be administered based on feelings. In doing this she is opening the town up to F.O.I. violations, potential litigation, and fanning the flames of the crazy conspiracy theories. To quote the article, "we feel its an extreme invasion of privacy for these families." Should someone take this to F.O.I. or put it before a judge the town will lose. Do your job as required by statute.