.
Feedback

Gaston Calls for a Vote on Owner-Operators

Selectman candidate Jim Gaston is calling for a vote on whether to retain the Newtown owner-operators and allow housing use at Fairfield Hills.

Selectman candidate and Board of Finance member Jim Gaston is calling for a local question or referendum to be held on two separate and equally controversial issues – the and housing at Fairfield Hills.

Gaston made the proposal as part of his “Return to Reason” campaign platform speech Sunday during what was billed as the Democrats’ grand opening of their Main Street election headquarters, about an hour prior to the parade.

“First as to the owner-operators, I propose that we have a local question on the matter, because you see, on that All-Star contract, there’s a provision that states should the voters not financially support All-Star contract, the contract is void,” Gaston said. “I propose a simple question on this local question: Do you financially support the All-Star bus contract? Yes or no? If it’s no – in other words, if it fails, the new Board of Education voids the contract. Second on that same local question, we include – simple – do you support housing on Fairfield Hills, yes or no?”

In addition, Gaston proposed the formation of an ad-hoc committee to craft “the exact wording of the referendum/local question.” He suggested that the members consist of himself; Independent Party of Newtown Legislative Council member Kevin Fitzgerald; Republican Board of Finance Chairman John Kortze; Republican Legislative Council member Mary Ann Jacob or Kathy Fetchick; Republican Board of Education member Debbie Leidlein; and Republican First Selectman Pat Llodra.

But one of the problems to his proposal is that “local questions” are only allowed to be asked during November elections, which with about a month more to go would be too short of a notice and wouldn’t be legally permissible, officials said. The only other alternative would be through a referendum, but that likely would be held well after the November elections and it was unclear whether the referendum would be able to compel the Board of Education to reverse its decision, officials said.

Llodra said she had looked into matter months ago, and the responsibility in awarding the bus contract falls under the education board’s purview.

“That is exclusively the Board of Education’s right,” she said of the bus contract.

Llodra said if the matter was up to her, she would have supported giving the owner-operators more time to re-organize into an umbrella association so that they could negotiate a single contract with the town. But because the bus contract fell to the education board, she was unsure what a referendum would accomplish.

“It would only be worth it if it would be persuasive to the Board of Ed,” Llodra said.

Gaston referred to a section of the contract that he said would allow for the contract to be terminated "should the voters not financially support the All-Star contract."

There is a section of the contract – Section 4.9 – which would allow the school district to terminate the contract at any time, including for "lack of appropriate funding to operate the transportation program," but it was unclear what would constitute a "lack of funding."

Selectman Bill Furrier, an Independent Party of Newtown member who is running for first selectman, said that in general he supports putting questions to a vote among the electorate, but in the matter of the owner-operators, there may be many legal questions to consider, namely that the education board already has signed a contract with All-Star.

“That’s a done deal,” Furrier said, adding he did not know what a vote would accomplish.

Furrier said he would support putting the question of Fairfield Hills out to a vote, and for more than just housing. The question of housing at the campus recently came up after the Planning and Zoning Commission , despite apparent community opposition to the concept.

Furrier said he would recommend forming a group to come up with a plan from the and then putting that plan to a vote.

“I like the idea that Jim said (regarding Fairfield Hills) and I think it should go further,” he said.

Furrier said he remains most concerned about the Fairfield Hills Authority ordinance and the powers it grants the Board of Selectmen.

Other members, such as Legislative Council member chairman Jeff Capeci and member George Ferguson said they would want to learn more about Gaston’s proposal as it relates to legality and other issues before commenting.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lois Imbriano Barber May 18, 2013 at 08:24 pm
To further support my support of Aurelia, the letter above states it was the New York Post thatRead More wanted the details. Good for you town clerk! I goggled the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information and they are indeed nothing more than a non-profit group. They are not a government agency. And an inept one - their own website is a mess. What clowns.- http://ctcouncilfoi.org/
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Town Clerk Aurelia is already causing the town to needlessly spend money defending her derelictionRead More of duty: "An attorney representing the town, with the law firm Cohen and Wolf, issued an opinion in response to the, (New York), Post's request stating that the public is only allowed to view death and marriage certificates that are "at least one hundred years old." Cost aside she is pushing for a state law that would restrict access to a minors birth certificate for 6 months, she originally wanted them sealed for 10 years. The only thing the proposed law is going to accomplish is the healing that has been accomplished is going to be undone when the seal expires. This is much ado about nothing. http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Newtown-officials-withhold-death-certificates-4526713.php
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:07 pm
While I have no desire to view any of these death certificates, the law is the law. I have neverRead More viewed a death certificate, I doubt there is anything listed beyond the name of the decedent, dates of birth & death, parentage, and cause of death. Town Clerk Aurelia is clearly in violation of her oath of office. Her job is not to be administered based on feelings. In doing this she is opening the town up to F.O.I. violations, potential litigation, and fanning the flames of the crazy conspiracy theories. To quote the article, "we feel its an extreme invasion of privacy for these families." Should someone take this to F.O.I. or put it before a judge the town will lose. Do your job as required by statute.