.
Feedback

Filming Will be Allowed at March Bus Labor Hearing

State officials confirm that videotaping will be allowed at state Board of Labor Relations meeting in March.

The much-anticipated second hearing into the school bus contract dispute scheduled for next month can be videotaped, according to officials at the Board of Labor Relations.

In December, board members directed three people who were videotaping the first hearing to turn off their cameras, saying it was not allowed, citing privacy concerns and adding that an audio of the session would be transcribed and be available later for purchase.

However, Freedom of Information laws allow for video taping of public hearings with some exceptions, such as the filming of Superior Court cases, which require the permission of the judge. The labor relations hearing is not among one of those exceptions, which Alexandra Gross, assistant general counsel for the board, confirmed last week.

The Newtown Owner-Operators filed a complaint with the board last year citing a violation of their rights. During the first hearing in December, about two dozen people sat in the audience observing the proceedings. While two reporters from the Newtown Bee and Newtown Patch and a third member of the audience turned on their videocameras to , board members later halted the proceedings and requested that the videos be turned off for the rest of the hearing.

Gross said that at the next hearing, anyone who wishes to videotape the proceedings will be allowed to do so without restriction.

"Film away," she said.

The hearings are to determine whether the Newtown school bus owner-operators are employees of the district, rather than independent contractors as language in their contracts identifies them. The owner-operators are arguing that they are employees and their collective bargaining rights were violated when the that begins in fall 2012 to All-Star Transportation.

The case is being closely watched by the owner-operators who will lose their livelihood if the All-Star contract proceeds as well as supporters of the decades-long tradition of having town residents own and operate the school district's bus system who see the labor dispute as the only chance of preserving the beloved system.

While the Board of Education has said provisions have been made in the All-Star contract should the owner-operators be deemed employees, a lawyer for the owner-operators argued that

The next hearing is scheduled for 1:30 p.m, March 7, 2012 in Wethersfield.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Announcements  

0   Recommend Kurt Kling

Lois Imbriano Barber May 19, 2013 at 05:40 pm
I remember years ago that not all of the information about the Kennedy death and assassination wouldRead More not be unsealed until 2017, so why not be able to seal the records of these deaths for the same amount of time?
Lois Imbriano Barber May 18, 2013 at 08:24 pm
To further support my support of Aurelia, the letter above states it was the New York Post thatRead More wanted the details. Good for you town clerk! I goggled the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information and they are indeed nothing more than a non-profit group. They are not a government agency. And an inept one - their own website is a mess. What clowns.- http://ctcouncilfoi.org/
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Town Clerk Aurelia is already causing the town to needlessly spend money defending her derelictionRead More of duty: "An attorney representing the town, with the law firm Cohen and Wolf, issued an opinion in response to the, (New York), Post's request stating that the public is only allowed to view death and marriage certificates that are "at least one hundred years old." Cost aside she is pushing for a state law that would restrict access to a minors birth certificate for 6 months, she originally wanted them sealed for 10 years. The only thing the proposed law is going to accomplish is the healing that has been accomplished is going to be undone when the seal expires. This is much ado about nothing. http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Newtown-officials-withhold-death-certificates-4526713.php