.
Feedback

Connecticut Budget Deficit Projected at $27 Million

State Comptroller Kevin Lembo also says the state's economic recovery remains sluggish, Medicaid spending is on the rise and he's worried about sales tax revenues.

Escalating Medicaid spending and slow personal income growth is helping to fuel a projected $27 million state budget deficit, State Comptroller Kevin Lembo has reported.  

In a letter Monday to Gov. Dannel Malloy, Lembo said that general spending by the state next year is on track to be $80 million in the red. The state’s budget deficit, Lembo said in his letter, is higher than expected in part because Medicaid spending by the state’s Social Services Department is on the rise. That department’s budget, Lembo said, currently has a $100 million deficit and  added 1,700 new Medicaid cases in August, he said. 

The state ended the 2011-12 fiscal year with a deficit of $143.6 million. The deficit was paid down using the state's reserves.

Connecticut’s economy continues to make a sluggish recovery, Lembo said in his letter.

“In August, Connecticut lost 6,800 payroll jobs. For the full twelve-month period ending in August, the state has added a scant 1,100 jobs,” he wrote. “Since the recovery commenced at the beginning of 2010, Connecticut has regained about one quarter of the jobs lost to recession.”

In addition, the state’s unemployment rate rose to 9 percent in August, higher than the national rate of 8.1 percent, and Connecticut’s average hourly earnings were down 1.1 percent. Weekly private sector pay fell 1.4 percent, Lembo wrote.

While revenue from the state income tax has continued to show “positive movement,” the state’s earning losses, Lembo said, are worrisome.

“I am especially concerned with the sales tax trend in light of slower personal income growth in the state,” he wrote. “The state’s income growth ranking fell from thirteenth highest in the nation to thirty-fourth. Sales tax receipts have historically shown a correlation to personal income, so this trend is of concern.”

You can view a PDF of Lembo's letter above.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lois Imbriano Barber May 18, 2013 at 08:24 pm
To further support my support of Aurelia, the letter above states it was the New York Post thatRead More wanted the details. Good for you town clerk! I goggled the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information and they are indeed nothing more than a non-profit group. They are not a government agency. And an inept one - their own website is a mess. What clowns.- http://ctcouncilfoi.org/
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Town Clerk Aurelia is already causing the town to needlessly spend money defending her derelictionRead More of duty: "An attorney representing the town, with the law firm Cohen and Wolf, issued an opinion in response to the, (New York), Post's request stating that the public is only allowed to view death and marriage certificates that are "at least one hundred years old." Cost aside she is pushing for a state law that would restrict access to a minors birth certificate for 6 months, she originally wanted them sealed for 10 years. The only thing the proposed law is going to accomplish is the healing that has been accomplished is going to be undone when the seal expires. This is much ado about nothing. http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Newtown-officials-withhold-death-certificates-4526713.php
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:07 pm
While I have no desire to view any of these death certificates, the law is the law. I have neverRead More viewed a death certificate, I doubt there is anything listed beyond the name of the decedent, dates of birth & death, parentage, and cause of death. Town Clerk Aurelia is clearly in violation of her oath of office. Her job is not to be administered based on feelings. In doing this she is opening the town up to F.O.I. violations, potential litigation, and fanning the flames of the crazy conspiracy theories. To quote the article, "we feel its an extreme invasion of privacy for these families." Should someone take this to F.O.I. or put it before a judge the town will lose. Do your job as required by statute.