.
Feedback

Chris Dodd Questions Need For Assault Weapons in Wake of Denver Shootings

The former senator, now head of the Motion Picture Association of America, was stumping for a candidate in Windsor on Monday and said the U.S. needs greater gun controls.

 

Former U.S. Senator Christopher J. Dodd said Monday he supports restrictions on some types of guns, particularly assault weapons, in the wake of the Denver shootings last week.

Dodd, a Democrat, was in Windsor stumping for a local democratic candidate. He questioned why anyone would need an assault rifle ---  one of the weapons the accused gunman used in Friday's rampage in Colorado that killed 12 and injured 58 --- and said even hunters can't make a good argument in support of the sale of assault weapon, according to the blog Capitol Watch.

“People have Second Amendment rights, in a sense," the blog quotes the former senator. "I respect that and support that. But, like all rights, there needs to be limitations. The right to free speech is not unlimited. You can’t scream fire in a crowded theater, as the saying goes. The right to bear arms ought not to be an unlimited right."

His comments come at a time when some are debating the role that accessibility to guns and violence in movies may have played in the shooting attack that took place during a screen of the Batman movie "The Dark Knight Rises."

Dodd, who has a home on the Connecticut River in East Haddam, was a longtime and powerful member of the U.S. Senate who opted not to seek re-election in 2010. He also made a brief run for president.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lois Imbriano Barber May 25, 2013 at 09:27 am
call Lois Barber 203 270-8017 to enter. The entry fee is a $10 check made payable to the NewtownRead More PBA (Police Benevolent Association)
Lois Imbriano Barber May 25, 2013 at 09:26 am
I still have spots available for you to post a photo of your child (newborn - 4 years) on my votingRead More booth. This is a charitable fundraiser and 100% of the money raised from this year's contest goes to Newtown's First Responders and the My Sandy Hook Family Fund - the only charity that is giving every penny it collects to the 26 families who lost loved ones.
Rick May 25, 2013 at 09:54 pm
Thanks, G, and good point. Of course, those of us that are intelligent and sane have realized a longRead More time ago that Fox lies. Clearly lies. And distorts, and name calls, and spins spins spins. Newsmax is no better. But, the lying should not be allowed because there are some many in society that are gullible or just plain dumb - or both - so they actually believe these things to be true - not because they are true but because they WANT THEM to be true. It gives them self-justification for their hatred.
G May 25, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Rick - MAC gets his "news" and forms his "opinions" from Fox News, RushRead More Limbaugh, Newsmax, et al. His "opinions" are just a regurgitation of their opinions. Fox News has readily admitted in court that they lie, so they are not a real "news" organization - apparently they have the first amendment right to lie while posing as a news organization ... http://www.librarygrape.com/2009/06/court-fox-news-has-first-amendment.html#.UaFlKdi1vkc
Rick May 25, 2013 at 06:50 pm
Mac, Newsmax is not a valid source for news stories. It is an opinion web site, biased very stronglyRead More in one direction: conservatism. As for the facts, you have none. Just conjecture. There is no evidence that Obama knew anything about the Benghazi incident before it happened, there is no statement or evidence that Obama condones or even knew about the IRS tactics - and to call them "thugish" is just plain name calling. It was questioning and investigating - as they can and should do, just with a SLIGHT bias towards Tea Party groups (70 out of hundreds). So get your facts straight, stop the name calling and get over the presidential hatred. I'd like to hear your opinion about lying about weapons of mass destruction to get us into an illegal war in Iraq, or even your opinion of the Iran-Contra scandal - unless of course you believe it is only Democrats that are worthy of criticism.
Announcements  

0   Recommend Kurt Kling