.
Feedback

Capitol Roundup: Redistrict Redux; Sunday Liquor [Poll]

A Republican plan to change congressional district lines appears headed for defeat while the governor is intent on allowing liquor sales on Sundays.

A new governor-backed proposal that would end Prohibition-era restrictions on liquor sales already has been greeted with mixed reactions.

For example, a on a Naugatuck Patch article show support for the proposal, which, among many recommendations, would allow package stores to open on Sunday, extend the hours of sales on liquor, eliminate the minimum price requirements and create a medallion system that would allow stores to sell the rights to their permit. See the first .pdf file for more information.

On the other hand, other people said easing the restrictions would force mom-and-pop stores to stay open on Sundays but not increase their revenue, proposing that the state instead look toward reducing the sales tax on liquor sales.

Gov. Dannel Malloy, who announced his plans to overhaul the state's liquor laws during at the , said the taxes also could be revisited in the future, according to an article by CT News Junkie.

While small independent liquor stores dominate the industry in the state, some of the sweeping changes being proposed by Malloy are likely to invite competition from larger stores, according to The Connecticut Mirror, which cites the proposed easing of ownership requirements that now allow for a maximum of two stores and under the plan would increase to up to nine stores.

Although some legislators have unsuccessfully attempted to lift the restrictions on liquor store sales on Sunday, this latest attempt is viewed as having a better chance because of the governor's backing. Connecticut and Indiana are the only states in the country to ban alcohol store sales on Sunday.

Also making headlines in the state was news that a Republican plan to drastically redraw U.S. Congress district lines – including moving towns such as Newtown from the Fifth Congressional District to the Fourth – appears headed for defeat.

Nathaniel Persily, a law professor who was appointed by the state Supreme Court to be the special master on redistricting, has recommended slight modifications to the existing congressional lines that is more in line with Democratic calls for few changes than the Republican plan for drastic shifts.

For instance, under the GOP plan, Democratic stronghold Bridgeport would have been moved from the Fourth to the Third Congressional District and towns with a solid Republican base, such as Newtown would be moved from the Fifth to the Fourth.

That configuration would have allowed Republicans a better shot at having one of their candidates face up against Rep. Jim Himes (D-4th)

House Minority Leader Lawrence Cafero (R-Norwalk), who was one of the main advocates for the GOP plan, said he accepted Persily's recommendations and was ready to "move on from here," according to CT News Junkie.

See the second .pdf file for more details on Persily's draft report.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:07 pm
While I have no desire to view any of these death certificates, the law is the law. I have neverRead More viewed a death certificate, I doubt there is anything listed beyond the name of the decedent, dates of birth & death, parentage, and cause of death. Town Clerk Aurelia is clearly in violation of her oath of office. Her job is not to be administered based on feelings. In doing this she is opening the town up to F.O.I. violations, potential litigation, and fanning the flames of the crazy conspiracy theories. To quote the article, "we feel its an extreme invasion of privacy for these families." Should someone take this to F.O.I. or put it before a judge the town will lose. Do your job as required by statute.
Common Sense May 18, 2013 at 08:19 am
Exactly why do you need to read these reports Elmer Davis? The cause of death was gunshot wounds.Read More Why do you need more than that, and why do you feel your curiosity for details outweigh the need for privacy? I agree with Aurelia and support her. You're acting like the Connecticut Council on Freedom is a government agency. It is a non-profit foundation and the quote from James Smith is only an opinion. It certainly does NOT carry any more weight than anyone else's, including mine, the victim's families, and the vast majority of decent people living in this town.