.
Feedback

Analysis: On the Attack for the Senate Campaign

How much of a political ad is substance, and how much is bickering? Patch is here to help you visualize the answer in the race between Linda McMahon and Chris Murphy.

 

With the final presidential debate having taken place Monday night and Election Day now less than two weeks away, winners of all the various races taking place across the city and state will soon be decided. But more importantly, Election Day means, finally, an end to the political attack ad. 

It's an interesting dynamic, the political attack ad. A candidate must vie for position amongst the public not just by building themselves up in the voter's eye, but by also diminishing the standing of his or her opponent.  

While an ad campaign might be understandable and encouraged, what about when campaigns get carried away? What level of attacking one's opponent is excusable and who would even be able to make that distinction? It's a subjective measurement. However, there are tangible things one can measure to gain a sense of what a campaigns priority might be. 

Could the argument be made that talking about an opponent more than one's self is talking too much about the other? An informal experiment was conducted to test just how often two candidates for one of the more contentious races in recent memory spoke about each other: Chris Murphy and Linda McMahon.

The bid for the United States Senate seat is being contested by former U.S. Congressman Murphy and business-savvy former WWE CEO McMahon. The race has been hot and vocal.

Only one of their names needs to be searched in email archives to receive roughly all of both campaign's releases, they talk about each other so often. Five from each house were selected at random for the test. One was selected from the finalists for a hand count and then all five were filtered through a word cloud generator.

The results are overwhelming. For Murphy, in a campaign statement released entitled "SHOCKING DEBATE ADMISSION: McMahon Won't Discuss Social Security Specifics on Campaign Trail to Avoid Disclosing Her Right-Wing Republican Plans," with four (!) subheads, Murphy's camp mentions McMahon directly or through pronouns like "she" or "her" 41 times. Murphy's name is mentioned twice.

Not to be outdone without a fight, McMahon, in a statement released entitled "Chris Murphy Does Not Respect Women in The Workplace," with only a single subhead, her camp manages to mention Murphy directly or by the pronouns "he" or "his" 36 times. She manages to squeeze in six mentions of herself. 

The results of the word cloud test confirm more of the same. By an outstanding margin, the political rival's name is used more often than any other talking point in each of the releases tested, and completely overshadowed any mentions of their own names.

So, when this election season is over, voting day won't just end political ads. It will just bring temporary relief to the phenomenon of grownups talking about each other. On Nov. 7, finally, everyone will get to put down their stones.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:47 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.
Nancy Bocian June 17, 2013 at 06:53 pm
I'm so concerned that she's caught somewhere in the woods. Are there any people who are looking forRead More her on foot?
Carol Chapman June 18, 2013 at 03:14 pm
Laura Dorr 6 hours ago near Newtown via Mobile Good news it looks like Norma is staying in the areaRead More so we will feed her and set the trap this weekend, prayers and keep your fingers crossed we get her!! (via Laura's FB page)
Nancy Bocian June 18, 2013 at 04:37 pm
So glad to hear this.
Betsy Kraushaar June 17, 2013 at 07:54 am
If you have goodies left that you are interested in donating to our Girl Scout Troop...pleaseRead More contact me. Our troop has been saving/ fundraising for a senior trip to Europe for the past 5 years. Thanks in advance, Betsy
Llyod Christmas June 17, 2013 at 09:01 pm
Hi Betsy! We have tons of children's books left, and would be more than happy to donate them. HowRead More should I get in touch with you to drop them off?
Betsy Kraushaar June 17, 2013 at 10:46 pm
Lloyd, My email is betsykraushaar@charter.net....I'd love to get some books...Thanks!!!
Every Friday, Rain or Shine, Lone Activist Stands
Elissa Bass June 14, 2013 at 08:44 pm
I do too.
Amy Pare June 16, 2013 at 09:28 am
This is amazing. Where is she standing?