.
Feedback

Weekend Police Blotter, June 4, 2011

Police issue news releases on underage driving under the influence and other incidents.

Church Hill Road: A 17-year-old was charged with underage driving under the influence, evading responsibility and failure to drive right on a curve in connection with a report of a one-car crash into a tree at about 11:05 p.m., Saturday, June 4 in the area of Walnut Tree Hill and Shepaug roads, police said. The driver was not at the scene when police responded but the operator was located in another vehicle that was stopped later on Church Hill Road, police said. Due to the driver's age, police did not release the identity. The teenager was released on a $100 bond and is to appear June 27 in state Superior Court in Danbury.

Church Hill Road: Newtown police are investigating an accident that occurred at about 2:15 p.m., Saturday, June 4 at the intersection of Church Hill Road and the Interstate 84 westbond on-ramp, police siad. Anyone with information on the incident is asked to contact Officer Matt Wood at 203-426-5841.

Misty Vale Road: Police are investigating larcenies that occurred in the area of Pole Ridge and Misty Vale roads during the early morning hours of Saturday, June 4, officials said. Items were taken from unlocked motor vehicles in the area, police said. Anyone with information on the incidents are asked to contact Officer Bart Lorancaitis at 203-426-5841.

Washington Avenue: A Toyota Camry, operated by Wenjun Tang, 36, of Independence Circle, Southbury, turning onto Church Hill Road from Washngton Avenue collided with a Jeep Grand Cherokee, operated by Curtis Urbina, 53, of Camelot Crest, that was going straight from Glen Road at about 9:15 p.m., Saturday, June 4, police said. Police reported no injuries. Tang received an infraction for failure to grant right of way.

Editor's note: This blotter will be updated as police issue new news releases.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lois Imbriano Barber May 18, 2013 at 08:24 pm
To further support my support of Aurelia, the letter above states it was the New York Post thatRead More wanted the details. Good for you town clerk! I goggled the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information and they are indeed nothing more than a non-profit group. They are not a government agency. And an inept one - their own website is a mess. What clowns.- http://ctcouncilfoi.org/
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Town Clerk Aurelia is already causing the town to needlessly spend money defending her derelictionRead More of duty: "An attorney representing the town, with the law firm Cohen and Wolf, issued an opinion in response to the, (New York), Post's request stating that the public is only allowed to view death and marriage certificates that are "at least one hundred years old." Cost aside she is pushing for a state law that would restrict access to a minors birth certificate for 6 months, she originally wanted them sealed for 10 years. The only thing the proposed law is going to accomplish is the healing that has been accomplished is going to be undone when the seal expires. This is much ado about nothing. http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Newtown-officials-withhold-death-certificates-4526713.php
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:07 pm
While I have no desire to view any of these death certificates, the law is the law. I have neverRead More viewed a death certificate, I doubt there is anything listed beyond the name of the decedent, dates of birth & death, parentage, and cause of death. Town Clerk Aurelia is clearly in violation of her oath of office. Her job is not to be administered based on feelings. In doing this she is opening the town up to F.O.I. violations, potential litigation, and fanning the flames of the crazy conspiracy theories. To quote the article, "we feel its an extreme invasion of privacy for these families." Should someone take this to F.O.I. or put it before a judge the town will lose. Do your job as required by statute.