.
Feedback

Police Presence at Schools: Some Parents Ask for Reassurance

As many students go without recess at school, parents ask the board to ensure police won't be going anywhere.


Amy Roman is glad to see the police presence at schools across Newtown after the Dec. 14 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. But she doesn't want them to go anywhere.

She spoke Tuesday night at meetings of the Board of Police Commissioners and the Board of Education, asking both groups to ensure that police presence is sufficient at schools.

A parent of two children at Head O'Meadow School, Roman says the school system was a major reason she moved to Newtown three years ago. She said she's spoken with many parents in the past weeks.

"The parents I spoke to felt continued police presence was pretty much a given," she said at the Board of Police Commissioners meeting. "Based on conversations I've had over last few days with finance and selectmen, it seems nothing with regards to that is a given."

At least two police officers are on the ground at every school in Newtown, according to Superintendent Janet Robinson, and Chalk Hill School in neighboring Monroe — the current location for Sandy Hook Elementary School students — is receiving a special level of presence.

"There's a lot of anxiety around [continued police presence]," Robinson told the board. "You may see the car at the foot of the driveway as a vehicle from another town. Our police at this point don't have the resources to do that, so the other towns are contributing. We're meeting with the police, evaluating, so right now we're going to say it's indefinite. I know some people want to have a stronger commitment, but we'll see where that goes." 

Roman told the board police presence at schools has been on her mind every day — it's one of the main reasons she feels comfortable sending her kids to school.

"It's something we think about every day when we watch our children get on the bus for school," she said. "And we feel it's gone from a want to a need."

The last line drew applause from some other parents in attendance at the Board of Education meeting, where she was one of several parents to offer public comments to the board.

"Going forward, people do want to see permanent police presence at schools," said Michelle Hankin, another parent. "It's unfortunately a new world people are dealing with, and it helps people to learn to feel like they're in a safe environment ... I think a basic human need is security, and security needs have changed."

David Freedman told the board he also came to Newtown for the school system.

"I agree we ought to have police presence," he said, "but we ought to balance it out with the ability for kids to learn, to play, to enjoy being kids without the fear of turning around the corner and having something happen." 

Freedman was bothered by Robinson's report that Newtown's students haven't been getting recess time since the shooting.

"Having kids go on playground is essential," he said. "Please think about the ability to balance police presence, which I'm 1000% for, with the emotional impact of children."

Board of Education Chairman Debbie Leidlein told Patch there's a possibility the level of police presence may change over time.

"Everybody has their recommendations or their belief in what's necessary and what's appropriate," she said. "At this point in time, I believe the level we have is meeting the needs of our faculty, our parents and our students. But that may change. It needs to be an ongoing assessment and an ongoing discussion."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lois Imbriano Barber May 18, 2013 at 08:24 pm
To further support my support of Aurelia, the letter above states it was the New York Post thatRead More wanted the details. Good for you town clerk! I goggled the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information and they are indeed nothing more than a non-profit group. They are not a government agency. And an inept one - their own website is a mess. What clowns.- http://ctcouncilfoi.org/
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Town Clerk Aurelia is already causing the town to needlessly spend money defending her derelictionRead More of duty: "An attorney representing the town, with the law firm Cohen and Wolf, issued an opinion in response to the, (New York), Post's request stating that the public is only allowed to view death and marriage certificates that are "at least one hundred years old." Cost aside she is pushing for a state law that would restrict access to a minors birth certificate for 6 months, she originally wanted them sealed for 10 years. The only thing the proposed law is going to accomplish is the healing that has been accomplished is going to be undone when the seal expires. This is much ado about nothing. http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Newtown-officials-withhold-death-certificates-4526713.php
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:07 pm
While I have no desire to view any of these death certificates, the law is the law. I have neverRead More viewed a death certificate, I doubt there is anything listed beyond the name of the decedent, dates of birth & death, parentage, and cause of death. Town Clerk Aurelia is clearly in violation of her oath of office. Her job is not to be administered based on feelings. In doing this she is opening the town up to F.O.I. violations, potential litigation, and fanning the flames of the crazy conspiracy theories. To quote the article, "we feel its an extreme invasion of privacy for these families." Should someone take this to F.O.I. or put it before a judge the town will lose. Do your job as required by statute.