.
Feedback

Sex Abuse Suspect Pleads Not Guilty

David Csanadi appears for his arraignment in U.S. District Court in Bridgeport.

Flanked by a public defender and with his father in the room watching, Newtown resident David Csanadi pleaded not guilty to federal charges of producing and possessing child pornography in U.S. District Court in Bridgeport Tuesday.

The 35-year-old Aunt Park Lane man and former Southbury landscaper appeared before U.S. Magistrate Judge Holly Fitzsimmons, who advised him of his rights and set a schedule for future proceedings, which will take place in New Haven.

Csanadi, accompanied by U.S. marshals, arrived in handcuffs and an orange jumpsuit. He wore glasses, had facial stumble and appeared thinner from when he was arrested earlier this year.

Upon seeing his father in the courtroom prior to the arrival of the judge, Csanadi pointed and gave him a thumbs-up, visibly relieved to see a friendly face in the courtroom.

In addition to entering a not guilty plea, Csanadi answered in a clear voice, "Yes, your honor" and "no," to Fitzsimmons' questions of whether he was aware of his rights and had enough money to pay for a lawyer.

Csanadi, who had been living on property owned by his family in Newtown, has been held at MacDougall Correctional Institution in Suffield on $1 million bond since he was arrested by in April. Police came to focus on Csanadi after receiving a tip from a .

He stands accused of gaining access to three girls, children of friends, and committing sex acts and other abuse on them, filming images of the acts on 8mm video tapes, according to court documents.

The first victim – an infant – was abused and filmed from 2007 to 2008 while the second victim – the 4-year-old – was abused in the summer of 2009 when Csanadi traveled to Rhode Island, according to the federal indictment. The third victim who also appeared on film but whose identity remains unknown, officials said, was abused on or about 2006, according to the indictment, which also lodges charges of possession of child pornography.

Due to their ages and the situation, the victims apparently did not know the abuse was occuring, according to court documents filed in the case.

In connection with the alleged abuse, state prosecutors levied three counts of first-degree sexual assault and other charges against Csanadi while the federal charges of producing and possession child pornography, which came following a , primarily relate to the filming of the alleged episodes.

While Fitzsimmons considered the question of setting bond, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Neeraj Patel said a federal detainer had been placed on Csanadi as he remains in custody on the state charges and that should continue, a condition to which Thomas said he did not object.

Fitzsimmons then gave Thomas until Jan. 10 to file pretrial motions in the case and until Jan. 24 for Patel to respond. The case would then proceed to U.S. District Court Judge Janet Bond Arterton in New Haven on Feb. 8.

Both lawyers, who are prohibited by court rules from saying much on the case outside of the courtroom, declined further comment.

Last week, state prosecutors in Danbury asked that their case against Csanadi be continued until Jan. 20.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lois Imbriano Barber May 25, 2013 at 09:27 am
call Lois Barber 203 270-8017 to enter. The entry fee is a $10 check made payable to the NewtownRead More PBA (Police Benevolent Association)
Lois Imbriano Barber May 25, 2013 at 09:26 am
I still have spots available for you to post a photo of your child (newborn - 4 years) on my votingRead More booth. This is a charitable fundraiser and 100% of the money raised from this year's contest goes to Newtown's First Responders and the My Sandy Hook Family Fund - the only charity that is giving every penny it collects to the 26 families who lost loved ones.
Rick May 25, 2013 at 09:54 pm
Thanks, G, and good point. Of course, those of us that are intelligent and sane have realized a longRead More time ago that Fox lies. Clearly lies. And distorts, and name calls, and spins spins spins. Newsmax is no better. But, the lying should not be allowed because there are some many in society that are gullible or just plain dumb - or both - so they actually believe these things to be true - not because they are true but because they WANT THEM to be true. It gives them self-justification for their hatred.
G May 25, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Rick - MAC gets his "news" and forms his "opinions" from Fox News, RushRead More Limbaugh, Newsmax, et al. His "opinions" are just a regurgitation of their opinions. Fox News has readily admitted in court that they lie, so they are not a real "news" organization - apparently they have the first amendment right to lie while posing as a news organization ... http://www.librarygrape.com/2009/06/court-fox-news-has-first-amendment.html#.UaFlKdi1vkc
Rick May 25, 2013 at 06:50 pm
Mac, Newsmax is not a valid source for news stories. It is an opinion web site, biased very stronglyRead More in one direction: conservatism. As for the facts, you have none. Just conjecture. There is no evidence that Obama knew anything about the Benghazi incident before it happened, there is no statement or evidence that Obama condones or even knew about the IRS tactics - and to call them "thugish" is just plain name calling. It was questioning and investigating - as they can and should do, just with a SLIGHT bias towards Tea Party groups (70 out of hundreds). So get your facts straight, stop the name calling and get over the presidential hatred. I'd like to hear your opinion about lying about weapons of mass destruction to get us into an illegal war in Iraq, or even your opinion of the Iran-Contra scandal - unless of course you believe it is only Democrats that are worthy of criticism.
Announcements  

0   Recommend Kurt Kling