.
Feedback

Police Say Newtown Man Secretly Taped 'Vast Number' of Women

Police in Salisbury, Mass., say the man's alleged crimes include posing as a medical researcher and videotaping women, including minors, at his Massachusetts beach house.

 

Details are emerging about a Newtown man who allegedly secretly taped "a vast number" of women, including his underage relatives, over a span of years, according to police in Salisbury, Mass., where the man had a beach house. In addition, the man -- David Anderson, 44, of Lafayette Road -- allegedly operated a false Craiglist ad and handed out flyers designed to lure in additional victims.

In November, Newtown Police arrested Anderson for child pornography when his wife allegedly found folders of "disturbing" images on his computer, and released on a $100,000 surety bond.

Then Salisbury police arrested Anderson in early Monday afternoon, and states other than Connecticut and Massachusetts -- including New Jersey, New York, New Hampshire and Washington -- are investigating Anderson's alleged actions.

"This started in Newtown when his wife found the images, which she soon realized were captured at their house in Salisbury," said Chief Tom Fowler of the Salisbury Police Department. The images allegedly included women who had visited the house over several years. Salisbury police seized two external hard drives, and forensic labs are investing the images, says Fowler.

At the same time, say police, Anderson was active on Craiglist.

"Two things were going on," said Fowler. "He was filming these people in his bathroom. He was also soliciting women for medical 'research,' if you will, performing what he called baseline exams under the ruse he was some type of medical research student. Part of what we discovered were questionnaires [Anderson had allegedly made.]" Fowler said Anderson also allegedly traveled to New York to hand out flyers.

According to CBS News in Boston, Anderson subjected women to "invasive digital probing" and filled his house with medical equipment in an effort to appear legitimate. He would allegedly videotape the encounters, police say.

No details were available on the content of the Craiglist ads, but police confirmed that Anderson allegedly offered to pay women who responded between $25 and $50. Police ask anyone who suspect they may be victims to contact authorities.

"If there's any victims out there that may not have realized they've been victimized, we'd first determine where it took place and then get them in touch with the proper authorities," said Fowler.

[The above arrest information was provided by the Salisbury Police Department and the Newtown Police Department. It does not indicate a conviction.]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Interested in Newtown's news, events, community bulletins, blogs and businesses? Sign up for the free Newtown Patch daily newsletter, "like" us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lois Imbriano Barber May 18, 2013 at 08:24 pm
To further support my support of Aurelia, the letter above states it was the New York Post thatRead More wanted the details. Good for you town clerk! I goggled the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information and they are indeed nothing more than a non-profit group. They are not a government agency. And an inept one - their own website is a mess. What clowns.- http://ctcouncilfoi.org/
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Town Clerk Aurelia is already causing the town to needlessly spend money defending her derelictionRead More of duty: "An attorney representing the town, with the law firm Cohen and Wolf, issued an opinion in response to the, (New York), Post's request stating that the public is only allowed to view death and marriage certificates that are "at least one hundred years old." Cost aside she is pushing for a state law that would restrict access to a minors birth certificate for 6 months, she originally wanted them sealed for 10 years. The only thing the proposed law is going to accomplish is the healing that has been accomplished is going to be undone when the seal expires. This is much ado about nothing. http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Newtown-officials-withhold-death-certificates-4526713.php
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:07 pm
While I have no desire to view any of these death certificates, the law is the law. I have neverRead More viewed a death certificate, I doubt there is anything listed beyond the name of the decedent, dates of birth & death, parentage, and cause of death. Town Clerk Aurelia is clearly in violation of her oath of office. Her job is not to be administered based on feelings. In doing this she is opening the town up to F.O.I. violations, potential litigation, and fanning the flames of the crazy conspiracy theories. To quote the article, "we feel its an extreme invasion of privacy for these families." Should someone take this to F.O.I. or put it before a judge the town will lose. Do your job as required by statute.