.
Feedback

Inside Jobs ‘Rear Their Ugly Head’

There’s been a string of alleged inside job crimes in Connecticut recently, and police often consider this angle when investigating a crime.


In Southbury, a McDonald’s manager is accused of helping accomplices rob the restaurant at gunpoint.

In Woodbury, a teen employed by a car dealership reported a robbery, but police say he helped arrange the crime with a co-conspirator.

Those two heists from this month were small potatoes compared to what a watch repair manager at the Victorinox warehouse in Monroe allegedly pulled off. The former employee is accused of stealing more than $1 million in watches over the course of the year and selling the jewelry out of state. The investigation was prompted by discrepancies in the company’s inventory.

The inside job has long been a staple of Hollywood heist films, and they’ve been especially common in Connecticut this month.

“The movies always sensationalize these things and we always look at [the crimes as] being real,” said Lt. Paul Vance, spokesperson for the Connecticut State Police.

Although several people are accused of inside jobs this month, Vance said there hasn’t been a sustained uptick.

“It’s a type of crime that sometimes rears its ugly head, and certainly during investigations any law enforcement will consider this possibility [of an inside job],” he said.

No one industry appears to be more susceptible to having an employee steal from within. “It can go all the way from white collar crime to some of the service-connected industries,” Vance said.

Sometimes the crimes seem relatively benign, such as a pair of Target employees in Orange accused of giving unauthorized discounts. Losses in the retail industry from employees can add up. The National Retail Federation estimates that losses due to the theft totaled $34.5 billion in 2012. The leading cause of those losses are employees, who stole 43.9 percent of the items.

Other inside jobs can be much more dangerous, especially when an armed robbery is involved.

"Something can always go wrong,” Vance said. “The participants are being placed in harm’s way, as are the bystanders.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lois Imbriano Barber May 18, 2013 at 08:24 pm
To further support my support of Aurelia, the letter above states it was the New York Post thatRead More wanted the details. Good for you town clerk! I goggled the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information and they are indeed nothing more than a non-profit group. They are not a government agency. And an inept one - their own website is a mess. What clowns.- http://ctcouncilfoi.org/
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Town Clerk Aurelia is already causing the town to needlessly spend money defending her derelictionRead More of duty: "An attorney representing the town, with the law firm Cohen and Wolf, issued an opinion in response to the, (New York), Post's request stating that the public is only allowed to view death and marriage certificates that are "at least one hundred years old." Cost aside she is pushing for a state law that would restrict access to a minors birth certificate for 6 months, she originally wanted them sealed for 10 years. The only thing the proposed law is going to accomplish is the healing that has been accomplished is going to be undone when the seal expires. This is much ado about nothing. http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Newtown-officials-withhold-death-certificates-4526713.php
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:07 pm
While I have no desire to view any of these death certificates, the law is the law. I have neverRead More viewed a death certificate, I doubt there is anything listed beyond the name of the decedent, dates of birth & death, parentage, and cause of death. Town Clerk Aurelia is clearly in violation of her oath of office. Her job is not to be administered based on feelings. In doing this she is opening the town up to F.O.I. violations, potential litigation, and fanning the flames of the crazy conspiracy theories. To quote the article, "we feel its an extreme invasion of privacy for these families." Should someone take this to F.O.I. or put it before a judge the town will lose. Do your job as required by statute.