.
Feedback

He Said, She Said: Reality Television

Is reality TV sexist?

 

Let me begin with a confession: I, passionate feminist Ella Dawson, love reality television. My best friends and I often find ourselves transfixed by Toddlers & Tiaras, a disturbingly entertaining pseudo-documentary series about child beauty pageants that has sparked several spin-off shows for its pint-sized divas. “Are you watching Here Comes Honey Boo Boo tonight?” my friend asked me yesterday, also an ardent feminist. Yes, yes I was.

But I must also confess: it’s hard to love reality television without also loathing it. My family has been known to gather in the living room to stare in horror at the antics of Snooki and Mike "the Situation" on Jersey Shore.

We each sit down on a sofa one by one over the course of the hour, drifting in like ashamed spectators drawn to a train wreck. By the end of the show we are disgusted, feeling both sick and smug at the same time. “I don’t know how you watch this trash,” my father says from behind his copy of The Economist, pretending to read while half-chuckling and half-wincing at Deena’s drunken stumbling around the streets of Florence. 

But that is why most of us watch reality television in the first place: to be shocked by the appalling behavior and lifestyle choices of others and to be reassured that we are somehow better than the personalities shown on screen. We assume that we are above the media, that we are only watching My Super Sweet Sixteen and The Bachelor Pad ironically. And it is this irony that makes reality television so dangerous. And so profitable for media owners and advertisers.

According to cultural critic Susan J. Douglas, “Irony offers the following fantasy of power: the people on the screen may be rich, spoiled, or beautiful, but you, O superior viewer, get to judge and mock them, and thus are above them… you can look as if you are absolutely not seduced by the mass media, while then being seduced by the media, while wearing a knowing smirk.”

In her book Enlightened Sexism, Douglas posits that reality television feeds into sexism woven through media today, as this sense of irony allows reality television producers to show deeply sexist depictions of women as attractive, vapid, and often desperate bimbos. Even the smartest of us buy into it, laughing it off as just reality television. We feel entitled to harshly judge the women on screen, whether they are competing to be a high fashion runway model or chivying their two-year-old to practice her beauty pageant routine. We eagerly anticipate these women getting their comeuppance, rolling our eyes as Snooki gets arrested on the boardwalk for public intoxication and rooting for a foolish woman on Bachelor Pad to get her heart broken.

Reality television makes us mean. It may be enjoyable, but it makes us mean.

Yes, reality television also encourages us to judge its men, but considering the fact that men still own and run the majority of media corporations in this country, I’m not so worried about harmful gender stereotyping of males.

Far more dangerous is teaching tweens and teenage girls the notion that their beauty is the only power they have, and that if they don’t look like the women on television, they are unworthy. Setting up teenage girls and young women to see other women as competition or ‘slutty’ is deeply unhealthy for all of us; viewers and participants, men and women alike.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:47 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.
Nancy Bocian June 17, 2013 at 06:53 pm
I'm so concerned that she's caught somewhere in the woods. Are there any people who are looking forRead More her on foot?
Carol Chapman June 18, 2013 at 03:14 pm
Laura Dorr 6 hours ago near Newtown via Mobile Good news it looks like Norma is staying in the areaRead More so we will feed her and set the trap this weekend, prayers and keep your fingers crossed we get her!! (via Laura's FB page)
Nancy Bocian June 18, 2013 at 04:37 pm
So glad to hear this.
Betsy Kraushaar June 17, 2013 at 07:54 am
If you have goodies left that you are interested in donating to our Girl Scout Troop...pleaseRead More contact me. Our troop has been saving/ fundraising for a senior trip to Europe for the past 5 years. Thanks in advance, Betsy
Llyod Christmas June 17, 2013 at 09:01 pm
Hi Betsy! We have tons of children's books left, and would be more than happy to donate them. HowRead More should I get in touch with you to drop them off?
Betsy Kraushaar June 17, 2013 at 10:46 pm
Lloyd, My email is betsykraushaar@charter.net....I'd love to get some books...Thanks!!!
Every Friday, Rain or Shine, Lone Activist Stands
Elissa Bass June 14, 2013 at 08:44 pm
I do too.
Amy Pare June 16, 2013 at 09:28 am
This is amazing. Where is she standing?