.
Feedback

He Said, She Said: Delaying Marriage

What is the best age to get married?

 

With the exception of Alec Baldwin, 54, and his 28-year-old bride Hilaria Thomas, this Sunday’s New York Times wedding section is filled with happy couples in their late twenties and early thirties.

It will come as a surprise to no one that marriage rates have steadily dropped over the past few decades in the United States. As a result of changing social mores and an unsteady economy, couples are waiting longer to tie the knot, or deciding against matrimony entirely. 

According to a December 2011 study conducted by the Pew Research Center, 51 percent of adults ages 18 or older are married, as compared to 72 percent of the same age group in 1960. The median age at first marriage, meanwhile, has steadily risen from 22.8 for men and 20.3 for women in 1960, to 28.7 for men and 26.5 for women in 2011.

The strongest drop in marriage rates can be seen in the 20-24 age group. In 1960, 60 percent of individuals in this age bracket were married, as compared to 14 percent in 2010. 

Some possible reasons to delay marriage may include pursuing higher education, placing an emphasis on finding a mate with steady employment, and feeling less pressure to conform to the expectation of marriage on young adults.

Regardless of the reasons why Americans are waiting longer to get married, there is evidence to show that waiting can lead to a healthier marriage. The likelihood of divorce drops with each year a woman waits to get married, and experts say incidences of domestic violence have decreased considerably over the past 30 years.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lois Imbriano Barber May 18, 2013 at 08:24 pm
To further support my support of Aurelia, the letter above states it was the New York Post thatRead More wanted the details. Good for you town clerk! I goggled the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information and they are indeed nothing more than a non-profit group. They are not a government agency. And an inept one - their own website is a mess. What clowns.- http://ctcouncilfoi.org/
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Town Clerk Aurelia is already causing the town to needlessly spend money defending her derelictionRead More of duty: "An attorney representing the town, with the law firm Cohen and Wolf, issued an opinion in response to the, (New York), Post's request stating that the public is only allowed to view death and marriage certificates that are "at least one hundred years old." Cost aside she is pushing for a state law that would restrict access to a minors birth certificate for 6 months, she originally wanted them sealed for 10 years. The only thing the proposed law is going to accomplish is the healing that has been accomplished is going to be undone when the seal expires. This is much ado about nothing. http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Newtown-officials-withhold-death-certificates-4526713.php
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:07 pm
While I have no desire to view any of these death certificates, the law is the law. I have neverRead More viewed a death certificate, I doubt there is anything listed beyond the name of the decedent, dates of birth & death, parentage, and cause of death. Town Clerk Aurelia is clearly in violation of her oath of office. Her job is not to be administered based on feelings. In doing this she is opening the town up to F.O.I. violations, potential litigation, and fanning the flames of the crazy conspiracy theories. To quote the article, "we feel its an extreme invasion of privacy for these families." Should someone take this to F.O.I. or put it before a judge the town will lose. Do your job as required by statute.