.
Feedback

Quinnipiac Poll Shows Broad Support For Gun Controls

The poll by Quinnipiac University shows voters support a ban on assault weapons and that even gun owners are split on the issue of weapons control.

 

By margins of 2-1 or more, Connecticut voters support most including universal background checks (93–6 percent), a new Quinnipiac University poll released today shows.  

Voters support stricter statewide gun-control laws, 66–30 percent, the independent poll finds. The poll shows support for specific measures including:

  • 68–28 percent back expanding the statewide ban on the sale of assault weapons. Gun owners are opposed 49–44 percent
  • 68–28 percent back a ban on the sale of ammunition magazines with more than 10 rounds. Gun owners are divided 49–48 percent
  • 72–27 percent back registration of all handguns, with annual renewal.  Gun owners are divided with 48 percent in favor and 50 percent opposed
  • 63 – 31 percent, including 50–46 percent among gun owners, favor limiting handgun purchases to one per month
  • 85–14 percent, including 71–28 percent among gun owners, back a permit requirement to purchase and carry all guns
  • 86–11 percent, including 85–12 percent among gun owners, favor a gun offender registry for those convicted of gun crimes;
  • 76–19 percent, including 65–32 percent among gun owners, back stricter gun storage requirements;
  • 50–43 percent back mandatory liability insurance for gun owners

“In the wake of the Newtown tragedy, there is overwhelming support among Connecticut voters for strengthening the state’s gun laws,” said Douglas Schwartz, PhD, director of the Quinnipiac University poll. “It is remarkable how bipartisan the support is for some of the most talked-about gun-control measures.  Universal background checks tops the list with 93 percent support, higher than we’ve ever seen for any issue in 20 years of Connecticut surveys.”

“Interestingly, Republican voters are divided 45–48 percent on the general question, ‘Do you support or oppose stricter gun-control laws in Connecticut.’  They support, however, most of the specific measures,” Schwartz added.

The Newtown tragedy makes them more likely to support gun-control, 54 percent of Connecticut voters say, while 43 percent say it makes no difference.

Voters are divided on a proposal to prohibit people convicted of drunk driving from owning guns, with 45 percent in favor and 48 percent opposed.

Voters also are divided on a proposed ban on children under 18 playing violent point-and-shoot video games in public arcades, with 46 percent in favor and 48 percent opposed.

Voters do support 54–41 percent placing armed police officers in public schools in the state. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Announcements  

0   Recommend Kurt Kling

Lois Imbriano Barber May 19, 2013 at 05:40 pm
I remember years ago that not all of the information about the Kennedy death and assassination wouldRead More not be unsealed until 2017, so why not be able to seal the records of these deaths for the same amount of time?
Lois Imbriano Barber May 18, 2013 at 08:24 pm
To further support my support of Aurelia, the letter above states it was the New York Post thatRead More wanted the details. Good for you town clerk! I goggled the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information and they are indeed nothing more than a non-profit group. They are not a government agency. And an inept one - their own website is a mess. What clowns.- http://ctcouncilfoi.org/
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Town Clerk Aurelia is already causing the town to needlessly spend money defending her derelictionRead More of duty: "An attorney representing the town, with the law firm Cohen and Wolf, issued an opinion in response to the, (New York), Post's request stating that the public is only allowed to view death and marriage certificates that are "at least one hundred years old." Cost aside she is pushing for a state law that would restrict access to a minors birth certificate for 6 months, she originally wanted them sealed for 10 years. The only thing the proposed law is going to accomplish is the healing that has been accomplished is going to be undone when the seal expires. This is much ado about nothing. http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Newtown-officials-withhold-death-certificates-4526713.php