.
Feedback

Chamber and Rotary Call for Business of the Year Nominations

Nominate a local business before Friday, March 16.

Local business are crucial contributors to local charities and organizations, and the Newtown Chamber of Commerce and honor these partnerships each year with their Business of the Year awards. They are calling for nominations of any business that strongly supports local causes in this ninth year of the awards. Anyone can nominate: residents, the organizations that receive the support, or the business owners themselves. Awards are given to one small (less than 15 employees) and one large (more than 15) business.

“A well-run business would be able to support local charities and organizations,” said Chamber President Tim Haas. “Businesses are the significant fuel for those local charities.”

The panel of  judges, two Chamber members and two Rotary members, will choose the winners based on “the amount of financial and in-kind contributions and any kind of work effort that they might do for fund-raising for a local charity,” Haas said. While the charities should be based in Newtown, “they could have some national flair, for instance, Relay for Life,” he said.

To nominate a business, use the form on the Chamber web site. Every person who sends in a nomination form will be entered in a raffle to win a bottle of wine. The nomination deadline is Friday, March 16.

In addition to bestowing the title on the winners, the Rotary Club and Chamber will each donate $100 to the winner’s charity or organization of choice. Last year’s winners were Newtown Savings Bank and Associated Refuse. The new winners will be announced at the Business of the Year Awards dinner on Monday, March 26, at 6:30 pm at the Inn at Newtown.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Newtown Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lois Imbriano Barber May 18, 2013 at 08:24 pm
To further support my support of Aurelia, the letter above states it was the New York Post thatRead More wanted the details. Good for you town clerk! I goggled the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information and they are indeed nothing more than a non-profit group. They are not a government agency. And an inept one - their own website is a mess. What clowns.- http://ctcouncilfoi.org/
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Town Clerk Aurelia is already causing the town to needlessly spend money defending her derelictionRead More of duty: "An attorney representing the town, with the law firm Cohen and Wolf, issued an opinion in response to the, (New York), Post's request stating that the public is only allowed to view death and marriage certificates that are "at least one hundred years old." Cost aside she is pushing for a state law that would restrict access to a minors birth certificate for 6 months, she originally wanted them sealed for 10 years. The only thing the proposed law is going to accomplish is the healing that has been accomplished is going to be undone when the seal expires. This is much ado about nothing. http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Newtown-officials-withhold-death-certificates-4526713.php
Jeff May 18, 2013 at 02:07 pm
While I have no desire to view any of these death certificates, the law is the law. I have neverRead More viewed a death certificate, I doubt there is anything listed beyond the name of the decedent, dates of birth & death, parentage, and cause of death. Town Clerk Aurelia is clearly in violation of her oath of office. Her job is not to be administered based on feelings. In doing this she is opening the town up to F.O.I. violations, potential litigation, and fanning the flames of the crazy conspiracy theories. To quote the article, "we feel its an extreme invasion of privacy for these families." Should someone take this to F.O.I. or put it before a judge the town will lose. Do your job as required by statute.